How Ridiculous Marijuana Legislation Is

Marijuana. It's a fact of life in Trinidad and Tobago and the Caribbean - not to mention Latin America - or the rest of the planet.  And what got me on this less-than-politically-correct topic is an 80 year old grandmother who was arrested with two of her children and a niece, was allowed bail at $5,000. The 3 younger accused were granted bail at $40,000 each. For 22 grams of marijuana.

That's 5.5 grams each if it were equally split, and an average of $31,250 in bail per person.

I could wax poetic about all the stuff liberals say about marijuana, but that's not really the point. The point is that marijuana is a fact of life in Trinidad and Tobago - like it or not - and its effects are akin to that of alcohol. With less violence. But the violence comes in because to traffick marijuana, one has to be a criminal. And criminals have to play by a different set of rules. Violent rules. If the powers that be can demonstrate that cases regarding marijuana use have caused violent crime, I'm all ears. No, the violence is in the trafficking. Anyone who has experimented with cannabis knows that, and based on some of the things I've heard politicians say and expect others to believe it seems apparent that the wacky weed is embedded in politics.

So we clog up the courts with this sort of nonsense. Nowhere in the world has legislation regarding marijuana curtailed the use of marijuana. It's like what happened with Prohibition in the United States - it just went underground. The government doesn't make money on it because it doesn't tax it directly. Instead, they clutter the courts and waste taxpayer money with grandmothers who might really have glaucoma.

Huh?

In fact, I sincerely doubt that most people know the etymology of ganja. গাঞ্জা. That word is derived from the river considered holy in India: The Ganges. Really. 

And decriminalization of marijuana is happening around the world. Take Argentina, for example. It's simply a matter of people continuously ignoring the laws and the fact that the laws are largely impossible to enforce against a population that has demonstrated that it will do it anyway. Take a look at the Wikipedia article on decriminalization of marijuana. You might be surprised.

In Trinidad and Tobago, the majority of Police reports on 'drug busts' seem almost always to be related to marijuana - but marijuana isn't the problem. Cocaine and its derivatives are. But how often do the police actually curtail cocaine usage? Not often. Maybe if they focused on that instead of burning fields or having rats eat the evidence in the police station... maybe they could actually focus on the real issue.

Personally, I know of at least one person who sells marijuana in South Oropouche - it's not a secret (and no, I'm not a customer). Everyone knows that if you want to get marijuana, you speak to X. And don't you worry, the South Oropouche police station knows who X is as well. But X plies his product in the back by the river without worry of reprisal. So why hasn't X been arrested? Some say that there are agreements with the Police. Others say other things. But at the end of the day, aside from sale of marijuana, it doesn't seem like X has legal issues. So maybe the police simply leave him alone. And that's not just in South Oropouche - it's nationwide.

Meanwhile, rumors of police planting marijuana on people abound. Or of evidence being resold through constabulary redistribution.

It seems to me that the Police Service and courts have better things to do than deal with this particular issue. I imagine that decriminalizing marijuana would decrease the case load on the courts and make the possibility of police planting evidence even more remote.

Or we could just wait around and see who else's grandmother gets arrested for simply being near some marijuana.

Or are the powers that be too stoned to figure this out on their own? Could be.

Comments

I think that decriminalising marijuana is the wrong way to go. It shoud be legal, it should be regulated, it should be taxed.

Laws should reflect facts, not superstition and hype. In the US, marijuana is a Schedule I drug - by law, it is considered to have "no accepted medical use" and high potential for abuse. (Cocaine is Schedule II; unlike marijuana, it has accepted medicinal use.) The politics of marijuana in the US are the politics of fear - it wasn't a problem until white people started listening to jazz music in the 1920s. The politics of marijuana are rooted in fears of racial mixing. And according to this article, anti-marijuana laws in general have their roots in the marginalisation of minorities.

Which brings us back to Trinidad. In the early 1900s, alcohol was the drug of choice of the 'creole' population (white and black), opium the drug of choice of the Chinese, and ganja the drug of choice of the Indians. Indians and Chinese were seen as alien interlopers by both the local elites and the Afro-Trini working class. Is it really surprising that their drugs of choice were banned?

That's given me some food for thought. Thanks, Ian!

You can also check out the article The Longest War by freelance journalist Gwynne Dyer not just for his arguments for decriminalisation but for an historical insight into who started the "War on Drugs".
Mr. Dyer has also written several other articles on this topic which can be located on his website at www.gwynnedyer.com.

[...] admin wrote an interesting post today Here’s a quick excerpt And decriminalization of marijuana is happening around the world. Take Argentina, for example. It’s simply a matter of people continuously ignoring the laws and the fact that the laws are largely impossible to enforce against a … [...]

What has drug prohibition effected on drug stats? Or to be more present and relevant to our situation, what happens when prohibition is lifted? Check out what Time has to say on Portugal's recent (2001) decriminalization of all drugs - including heroin, cocaine, marijuana, LSD and all! Must be mad right? Check the findings: http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1893946,00.html?iid=spher...

At least make the punishment appropriate to the crime - because at the moment marijuana possession IS a crime - in my eyes this offence should be on the level of a speeding ticket or the like.

And furthermore, would the police get their priorities straight? Murderers, rapists, real criminals can chill out while the police haul grannies to court for what amounts to a minute amount of relatively innocuous drugs, worse can be gotten off the shelves in any pharmacy.

The reason why cannabis was even criminalized was because a few powerful, greedy men's empires were threatened by the hemp plant. marijuana conspiracy malibu bright, which is by no means a cheap complimentary toothbrush if that's what you were picturing). They should just call it "the government needs an excuse to take more of our money" tax