The Toy Police

A lot of people are desensitized to police carrying around automatic weapons. Weapons that, on full auto, will empty a clip of ammunition in less than a minute. These are weapons that the Navy Seals use. Really. Look at this picture. Look familiar? That would be the MP5K. And I see them wandering around attached to Police and their Trinidad and Tobago Defence Force escorts all the time - most recently visiting a toy store last week in Gulf City.

Question: Do we really want anyone with fully automatic weapons visiting toystores? Or what about fetes? I recall going to a Petrotrin fete about 6 years ago and seeing a few police officers, dressed in the 'never can go wrong' style of complete black, with an MP5K. In the middle of a crowded area.

And no one blinked. Probably because they don't know what can come out of that muzzle - or how fast. This is a weapon that earned the nickname, 'room broom' - varying between 700 to 900 rounds per minute, dependent on the model. When you have to 'clear' a room, you can literally sweep with one of these weapons. The magazine is empty within seconds. It can go for single shot and burst as well, but... that's what this weapon can do. It's designed for one purpose. And that purpose isn't visiting toy stores, walking up and down a street or standing around in the center of a fete.

We won't even go into the rifles that the TTDF walks around with when escorting the Police.

And we won't get into the fact that despite this massive armament - more impressive, really, than the weapon and ammunition found during the campaign for the last election - crime has still gone up.

It may not have occurred to anyone but maybe this will remind people... there was a time when a revolver or a 9mm pistol was sufficient. And now, apparently, is a time when this calibre of weapon is ineffective.

So. Why are they being carried around again? 

And while I'm on the topic - why do we insist on having the Police drive around with their lights on? Why not turn them off unless there is an emergency? Is it to warn the criminals? Or is it to confuse tourists? I don't know.

I tell you what I do know. In a country where getting a weapons permit is all but impossible without a bribe or having a connection somewhere, the government has police and soldiers walking the streets with weapons that could easily kill a lot of people. And with the crime situation having increased over this last decade, I am forced to wonder why.

Why? Anyone have a clue?

Oh. The blimps. Can we send those back, please? Maybe we could sell them to Israel or something... well, maybe not Israel. They'd use them effectively and that could be a problem.

Comments

We have alot of ignorant, illiterate criminals out there. Look at the raid in Petit Valley. Look at the kind of automatic guns the criminals have. Police cannot walk around with handguns.

Automatic weapons haven't helped. Should we give them small nuclear devices next? 

Anyway - there is no need for them to walk around with these sorts of weapons. Those sort of weapons stay somewhere else and are broken out when there is a need.

Well that's your opinion.

I work in POS and see them most days and it doesn't bother me. They go to the banks, gas stations, KFC with them. It is what it is. Oddly enough, back in 2006 during the World Cup I witnessed a policeman shoot a couple rounds into the air on Ariapita Avenue, Woodbrook when a scuffle broke out across the road from CroBar. That was a handheld gun. Never saw or heard of one doing it with an automatic. There are rules for shooting in public places anyway. Hopefully someone took his badge number and dealt with it.

Your argument is that you are used to them.

My argument is that you shouldn't be.

That's why we have common ground. :-)

Remember when it started? July 27, 1990. Until that day, police never carried automatic weapons. Rarely would you even see long guns - those only came out for road blocks. Then came the coup. The policemen guarding the Gasparillo Police Station, and patrolling the school yard next door, and sitting in the abandoned house that overlooked the police station - they all carried long guns, but no automatic weapons. The police inspecting every car that got off the highway at Tarouba didn't have automatic weapons either. But once the hostages were freed, the police guarding Robinson and other senior ministers were carrying Uzis. Soon enough the police patrolling the streets were carrying automatic weapons.

And they've been there since...

Your comment about Israel reminded me of something I heard Christopher Dickie (Newsweek's Paris bureau chief) say on NPR yesterday -  that the sobering thing about the Israeli raid was the incompetence. And coupled with their failed invasion of Lebanon, and their failures in Gaza, it paints a picture of an Israeli military that's a mere shadow of its reputation.

Israel does have nice toys and it does have a fair amount of veterans. Most of the poor situations that the Israelis find them in look more strategic than problems in execution. And I think the strategy is all political. Why? An Admiral would be familiar with maritime law and would have warned them. A politician would say, "We will show them. Do it anyway."

From what I'm gathering, the Israeli media has a lot to do with that. But then, people choose what they want to watch...