Anand's Bazaar
Politics and by extension political office, carries with it onerous burdens that more times than not is thankless. When considering running for public office one must consider this seriously and the public should also have this awareness and admire those who do. It never, ever ends well and the final price is usually public shame, ostracization, jail and sometimes, death. Just ask Bas and Patos.
Prior to the General Elections I was disappointed to see the now honourable Attorney General unceremoniously leave the COP and cast Mr. Dookeran in a discourteous and tasteless light. I saw his move as one rooted in opportunism and betrayal. Had he not done so I believe he would have still been made Attorney General.
In discharging his duties, he brings with him the same ebullient aggression he brought to his private practice. Many have been critical of his public posturing and pronouncements. His consistent approach should be welcomed and be recognised as being the reason he's been tasked to be guardian of the Constitution. His fearlessness and passion (as he puts it) expresses his righteous rage that he directs at corruption and all forms of subversion of the Republic. He promises much and delivery of such in order to prosecute the treasonous actions of those who abused and misused our patrimony is eagerly awaited.
Whilst his aggressive stance can be construed as reckless, it should not waiver. Caution though, and extra vigilance for his personal safety is required. By treading on the toes of those who might have reason to be fearful he puts his person in potential danger. Speaking on the hustings in Tunapuna last night (21-07-2010) he announced that on the morning of 27th July 2010 he will put up for auction, all the properties of Mr. Bakr's Muslimeen as retribution for the physical damage they caused in 1990.
If history is to teach us about repeating mistakes of the past then the parallels of provocation that premised the 1990 insurrection need to be vigorously guarded against lest we revisit it in 2010. Treason is absolute in nature and those who betray a nation cannot and should not be excused for any reason. And even if it has taken twenty years to reach this point those old enough to remember will remember the tremendous hurt felt by the Republic. Being symbolic in nature the gains to be had might not be worth the price to be paid and maybe we should consider forgoing it.
Despite the histrionics, race baiting and outright hate that has been characteristic of our politics we've accepted change and transitioned into new governance without incident and peacefully. Let us not in this time take that discipline for granted and be mindful that it only takes a misguided minority to disrupt our peace.
- Christian Khabay's blog
- Log in or register to post comments

Comments
Pingback
[...] Anand's Bazaar | KnowTnT.com (Beta) knowtnt.com/node/226 – view page – cached Politics and by extension political office, carries with it onerous burdens that more times than not is thankless. When considering running for public office one must consider this seriously and the public should also have this awareness and admire those who do. It never, ever ends well and the final price is usually public shame, ostracization, jail and sometimes, death. Tweets about this link [...]
public service in general
You ask for the reader to consider the burden. Its a simple request - yet its easy to miss the importance of the message. Consider too, hype may affect the judgement of the person seeking office.
From the perspective of the new ministers, I have wondered how it feels to toe a line handed down by the PM (any PM), meet what seems to be arbitrary deadlines, target moving goalposts, and essentially give up my own personal life.
I concluded that its takes the special personality common to great courtesans,skilled mountebanks, idle lawyers, unemployable engineers, inexperienced geologists, teachers without vocation, dysfunctional parents and such. After time, some attrition by the press, the public eye, and the tools of good governance, a great statesman (but never two) may arise though.
Another topic which I hope this blog may address is the phenomena of opposition pairing. Hitler/Adolf, William/Capildeo, Manning/ Panday. I wonder who is the pair to become locked in lifelong war this time around. And i do not think its as simple as KP-B/KR. This last interests me cos I think big fights make bigger outcomes. cheers - great post by the way .
Collective Responsibility trumps individualism
Thanks. I think Mr. Warner explained it well. Collective responsibility. Being part of a government, such as ours one must be willing to part with personal agendas and toe party lines. In forging our democracy it was intended that collective responsibility be the outcome from consensus building whereas, the previous government practiced consensus allocation which promoted autocracy and eventually lead to its downfall. If we are to believe Mr. Warner's words then we must believe that true consensus building takes place at the Cabinet Level. The decisions taken might not be popular but we must believe/hope that the views of all the relative stakeholders are measured/considered. What results might not be the best, but should be the best considering all or as many circumstances.
As far as Dr. Rowley is concerned he has up to this point been politically outmanouvered and is no match for the PM. He's admitted as much and if he is up to the task a complete dismantling of and reconstitution of the PNM, its core values and principles are vital if it is to regain relevance. The legacy and stain of Mr. Manning will take some doing for the PNM to rid itself of, much like the damage Dr. Williams did to the Republic, much of which we are still saddled with. In the short term though Dr. Rowley must choose his fights carefully and address real issues. Chasing phantom menaces only further damages the party's image and erodes its base. Similarly, he must carefully look at those who assist him and be mindful that they too are coming off as same old PNM. Unless the message and language coming out of the PNM is radically changed and intellectualised to inspire a knowing public to question more, then financiers will not be the only ones forsaking them. There are no longer shadows left to hide in.