Ace Suares, a friend of mine in the Netherlands Antilles, has been hearing a lot about Trinidad and Tobago's IT initiatives through a group called iGovTT. Frankly, without Ace I wouldn't have been able to write this because I've been busy with other things over the last few days.
Apparently iGovTT been quite busy in Curacao telling people about their big plans while they don't even have a functional website.
Honestly, I had not even heard of iGovTT before. It was mentioned before in the newspapers, but only briefly and never anything of worth. From this document (PDF), mined through Google, their mission is: We are the first choice for ICT services globally through the exploitation of Trinidad and
Tobago’s knowledge-based society.
Seriously, they need to work on that vision statement. 'Exploitation' screams for a replacement word. Actually, the whole vision statement should probably be ground up and fed to stray dogs as a matter of saving the world from yet another idiotic vision statement.
Because of all of this, Ace has been pointing me at things within Trinidad and Tobago's local media - something that I truly appreciate - and this requires me to get to writing about what is wrong with what they're doing. The list of what they are doing right, in my opinion, is much shorter. Perhaps that's why they're trying to sell that short list in Curacao.
Ace, over in Netherlands Antilles, has been keeping track of Trinidad and Tobago's media while I've been juggling other fragments of reality. He was kind enough to point me to the Trinidad and Tobago Express article, Coming soon: T&T's own Silicon Valley:
Trinidad and Tobago is embarking on a thrust to fund and develop an Information Technology and Communications (ICT) cluster, much like a local, scaled-down version of the United States’s Silicon Valley.
While the research done here is not expected to be for space travel, quantum computing or artificial intelligence, the software developers, web page designers and encoders will aim for their research to fuel development and sectoral capacity building, in all facets of the local economy...
Wait a minute. Are we talking about things like the E-Teck initiative that is panhandling for a budget? The Trinidad Guardian published the article ICT Sector Needs Funding For Growth just under a month ago. I am not sure how E-Teck and iGovTT are connected, but if they're not working together then they're working toward the same goals in parallel - with at least the same Chinapoo fellow involved in both. Who is doing what? Why all these fancy names? What's going on? It's apparent that the Trinidad and Tobago media doesn't have a cohesive understanding of what is going on. So why is it that these same initiatives are being highlighted in Curacao when they have not yet accomplished a single thing? There has been no return. A lot of money has been spent, but... nothing of substance.
So now we get to the Myth of a T&T Silicon Valley. Don't get me wrong, there has been and continues to be potential for a local 'Silicon Valley', but I don't agree with what they believe they are going to accomplish. In fact, the only difference between these groups (or group) and myself are that we have conflicting opinions and they found a budget to get themselves paid whereas I haven't needed a budget. And the fact that myself and others like me haven't had the need of a budget to do things is the very core of my opinion and argument against such initiatives.
Silicon Valley Reality.
But first, lets look at Silicon Valley. As of 1998, Silicon Valley's population was 2.3 million people. While the census is over 10 years old, it's just as good as the Trinidad and Tobago local census that was published from data at about the same time. So, roughly speaking, the population of Silicon Valley is twice that of Trinidad and Tobago. And the entire Santa Clara Valley, which Silicon Valley is only a part of, is 30 miles by 15 miles. 450 square miles. Trinidad is roughly 60 miles by 40 miles. 2400 square miles.
There's a big difference in population density - Trinidad, by itself, has half the population in Silicon Valley while having a little less than 3 times the surface area.
This is important because the population density possible within Silicon Valley is only possible with the level of infrastructure that Silicon Valley has. Trinidad and Tobago's infrastructure is choking development at this point - and the answer that some came up with was to develop infrastructure in a small part of the country with a lot of money - when the reality is that money put into infrastructure would have gone a lot further toward development goals. $500 million dollars, half of which is already spent, hasn't really done anything for the country and certainly hasn't done anything.
We won't get into the fact that the money spent hasn't helped a single startup company in Trinidad and Tobago - and that all the initiatives have been biased toward large business instead of small and medium enterprises that could grow into large businesses. There's a reason you don't have full grown chickens in incubators - yet for some reason, the allegedly intelligent people behind these initiatives are building incubators for full grown chickens. That's a bit peculiar, isn't it? It's almost as if they're being controlled by big business - bypassing lobbyism and going straight for direct control.
It's borderline corruption in my thoughts - in fact, I'd love to see someone do some auditing on these initiatives.
The sad truth is that the money that has been spent has done nothing and the future expenditures are unlikely to produce anything of worth. The reality is that Trinidad and Tobago needs to retain the smart people who leave. The reality is that the education system needs to accomodate and foster innovation and creativity - something Thomas Friedman wrote about only a few weeks ago in The New Untouchables:
...Just being an average accountant, lawyer, contractor or assembly-line worker is not the ticket it used to be. As Daniel Pink, the author of “A Whole New Mind,” puts it: In a world in which more and more average work can be done by a computer, robot or talented foreigner faster, cheaper “and just as well,” vanilla doesn’t cut it anymore. It’s all about what chocolate sauce, whipped cream and cherry you can put on top. So our schools have a doubly hard task now — not just improving reading, writing and arithmetic but entrepreneurship, innovation and creativity.
Bottom line: We’re not going back to the good old days without fixing our schools as well as our banks.
And that's Friedman writing about... the same country that Silicon Valley exists in. If Trinidad and Tobago is planning to be a global competitor in ICT, it needs to stop spending money on the carrion of failed ideas of yesteryear and get competitive from the bottom up. Doing it from the top down has consistently wasted money and given no results.
But then... those in power don't want to relinquish their power. They are the dinosaurs, the present global economy is the tar pit... and with the right infrastructure, anyone can do anything that is supposed to be done in the money pit that they're creating... without the budget.
Unfortunately, having bad ideas isn't a criminal act... and implementing bad ideas, the same. Even so, it deserves more attention. Too bad Calder Hart and UDECOTT have everyone so busy. Or maybe there are a few people smiling because of it.
Comments
Pingback
November 27, 2009 by $TT 77 Million For Motor Vehicle Software | KnowTnT.com (Bet (not verified), 15 weeks 7 hours ago
Comment id: 180
[...] As a senior software developer and ICT consultant with 21 years of varied experience in multiple fields, I view this as a slap to the face of the governments own attempt to grow a local Silicon Valley, as I wrote about here. [...]
If only...
November 5, 2009 by Ian Ramjohn, 18 weeks 1 day ago
Comment id: 119
For the last 10 years or so, I've been wondering what it would take to set up, if not a "silicon valley", then at least a real computer industry. (Yeah, longer than 10 years really, but back then I was wondering about manufacturing hardware.) There's a lot that could be done to facilitate small business, entrepreneurship. Maybe they could start by putting out bids - simple bids, sans the usual red tape - to small businesses to design a a website for iGovTT?
As for iGovTT...where to begin? Did you notice that the pdf you linked to (which really doesn't deserve the designation of being a "document") is dated:
So does that mean that it takes three years to come up with a draft of a draft?
While I have deep doubts about the ability to GORTT to do anything for small business, I really don't see a PNM government doing anything of the sort. Ideologically, I think it's incompatible with who they are. Which reminds me - I really need to finish that post on (my uninformed ramblings about) political ideology in our system...
Sorry for the late response.
November 6, 2009 by Taran Rampersad, 18 weeks 5 hours ago
Comment id: 122
I meant to respond earlier, but... life is a bit hectic these days.
In the 1980s, there was a Time magazine article featuring Indira Gandhi. She described a future of information society and the work that was being done in India back then to create what India is today - and while that was probably a biased article, it made me think that it was possible in T&T. It never happened.
What has to happen for T&T to become more active in such an arena as ICT? Well, first there has to be an acceptance that quick solutions are not likely to work. Then there has to be a culture that feeds innovation - something I think T&T used to have, but I don't see that much of now. Or maybe I'm getting older and jaded. Or maybe my expectations are very high. Likely it is a combination of all.
Hmm. Designing a website for iGovTT would be a challenge because they don't seem to know what they want to do. Any idiot can put up a website - in fact, they often do - but a good website has to have some sort of general plan. And that requires the institution behind the website to have the same. Generally speaking: websites don't make good ideas, good ideas make good websites. I have yet to see a 'good idea' when it comes to iGovTT.
Yes, I noticed the issues of dates with that PDF file. That's why I linked to it - it demonstrates how disconnected it is from reality.
I'm not sure that the issue is as much PNM as it is the colonial mindset - a mindset which is in all the active political parties at this time, as far as I can tell.
ICT industry development in T&T
November 6, 2009 by Edmund Gall, 18 weeks 3 hours ago
Comment id: 124
Good piece.
My thoughts on the ratio of state vs private funding/leadership required to set up a profitable ICT industry in T&T are not fully-formed yet. However, as an undergrad, I was involved in one of the projects of UWI's Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering's Real-time Systems Group (RTSG). The RTSG was a successor to the Dept's Microprocessor Development Project, and involved skilled developers producing technology for UWI and private sector companies. At the time, it was led by Prof St Clair King (wife of economist Mary King). I don't know if it's still active - from a UWI Pelican Magazine report, it seemed to have died at some point and was due for re-vitalisation under Drs Copeland and Mallalieu and a link to it on UWI's website is dead although it still appears on a list of research units under the Fac. of Eng. The RTSG spawned at least one company, but I don't know how many were eventually spawned or have survived - one company, Ixanos, doesn't appear to be alive (well it's website doesn't appear to have been refreshed since 2005). I can't recall all the names of the gals and guys employed by the RTSG (I was supported by Permanand Mohan).
If you call Dr Mallalieu, you may get some insight into how easy/difficult it has been to develop an ICT industry in T&T.
To me, if the state wanted to kick-start the industry, it would be by way of developing university-centred clusters, similar to what obtains in the UK. Since UWI and UTT are spinning out computer engineers and programmers, then use them as incubators for local/regional customers to get cheaply-developed tech solutions of good quality, and then use other agencies, like the Small Business Development Company, to fund any Ixanos-like companies started by entrepreneur engineers/programers.
To my mind, we can use a BBQ analogy. The clusters are the BBQ pits (framework where all the action happens). State resources would provide some starter fuel and matches to light the coals (start-up policy and funding). Private/public companies would provide the meat (the projects). Private venture capitalist companies would provide the air (funding to take young companies initially funded by SBDC to the next level). The programmers/engineers are the coals (the entrepreneurial fuel).
Maybe the government was trying to do this through E-Teck, In-Tech, iGovTT, fastforward etc., but are tripping up by using too many cooks.
Your incidental commentary on the poor use of the Internet by the very team who's supposed to be leading the thrust is part of a piece I'm doing on how the different parties currently use the Internet (or don't, mostly). Hopefully, I'll publish this by the end of the weekend.
Actually...
November 7, 2009 by Taran Rampersad, 17 weeks 6 days ago
Comment id: 126
I do know Dr. Mallalieu; we've spoken at length about ICT in T&T but never crossed paths again. She and I agree on some things, at least.
I'm really against manufacturing clusters. I'm also against a localized software industry. There's some weight behind those thoughts that I should formalize into another post... it's not that they aren't functional or useful, those cluster thoughts, but that they tend to become intellectually onanistic to a large degree (or a degree I don't find acceptable).
Internet usage. Oh, don't get me started. Will love to read your piece when you're done. :-)
underpants gnomes
November 6, 2009 by Ian Ramjohn, 18 weeks 3 hours ago
Comment id: 125
I think the dominant mindset in government (and, I think, especially in the PNM) is one of top-down control of the economy. The Third World socialist "industrialism by design" model of the 50s - 80s has largely fallen out of fashion, but like the former managers of a Soviet collective farm, our government can't see beyond that model.
I'm not free-market fundamentalist. I think there's a role for government in development of the economy. But I think that the sequence of interventions runs from infrastructure to financial assistance to get started (seed money, loan guarantees) to contracts (which are aimed at the actual capacity of the existing industry). As opposed to the model that starts with contracts (big ones, for the boys, of course), followed by Phase 2, leading somehow ot an ICT industry. The problem, I suppose, is that if you award $100 million in one contract, you can expect your kickback to be nice and big. But if you award the money in $10-50,000 contracts, you need to accept too many kickbacks if you want your $20 million. And since most people can't wrap their minds around such big numbers, it's just so much easier to pad them.
Yeah.
November 7, 2009 by Taran Rampersad, 17 weeks 6 days ago
Comment id: 127
"Industrialism by design" meets colonialism.
And yes, the kickback issue... well stated.
Pingback
November 5, 2009 by Global Voices Online » Trinidad & Tobago: (not verified), 18 weeks 1 day ago
Comment id: 118
[...] Taran Rampersad debunks “the Myth of a T&T Silicon Valley.” Cancel this reply [...]
Pingback
November 5, 2009 by Taking On The Myth of a Local Silicon Valley (not verified), 18 weeks 1 day ago
Comment id: 116
[...] Read the original here: Taking On The Myth of a Local Silicon Valley [...]