Category: Privileges Committee

Can the media do no wrong?

November 14, 2009 by Edmund Gall

It's being reported today that our House of Representative's Privileges Committee has recommended that Newsday reporter, Andre Bhagoo, be banned for the remainder of this Parliament's session for being guilty of contempt of Parliament, arising from premature publishing in the Newsday of the activities of a House sub-committee before it reported its findings to Parliament (which contravenes both the Standing Orders and Erskine May Parliamentary Practice).

MATT has stated that it's a bit harsh, since the Newsday's editor has taken full responsibility for the act and apologised.  Apparently, similar acts have occurred before and the trend has been to accept the apology and move on.

This has led bloggers to criticise the government for the proposed action, as the Privileges Committee is comprised predominantly of PNM members.  Some bloggers have used this as an entry point to a discussion on fascism - see the comments following the article on the Guardian.  Some are calling for other media houses to boycott Parliament in protest.  Others see it as another example of the PNM's attempts to muzzle anyone who criticises it - apparently Mr Bagoo reports frequently on UDeCOTT issues.  Most see it as a threat to freedom of the press.

Here's the thing.  The Newsday has acknowledged that it did wrong.  So why is banning the reporter for the rest of the session (about a month, since the session ends 16 Dec 2009) being viewed as a threat to freedom of the press? {Read more}