When Edmund Gall first wrote about the de facto monopolization of Carnival broadcast rights in Trinidad and Tobago (read it!), he mentioned friend Mark Lyndersay's point that it was more about control than optimization. When I wrote about the issue last night, I took the same tack.
Is it the right tack? Some may not think so. Lets consider a parallel. Let us consider broadcast rights in sports.
In sports, media companies are granted rights to broadcast and rebroadcast a sporting event - be it the Olympics, the Super Bowl, cricket, tennis, etc. A key difference between carnival and sport is that sports broadcasts are typically of people getting paid to move a ball from one place to another. This is not to diminish their ability with balls - it is in fact because they are so good with moving balls around that they get paid. Carnival, on the other hand, has people who have paid to play mas (for foreigners, that means dancing and prancing in costumes some deem artistic).
Thus, the very basis of the parallel is skewed: Sports broadcasts are of people who are typically paid to play with balls. Carnival broadcasts are typically of people who paid to play themselves. The balls joke was too easy. {Read more}
Recent comments
3 min 31 sec ago
12 hours 8 min ago
12 hours 54 min ago
1 day 11 hours ago
2 days 21 hours ago
2 days 21 hours ago
3 days 20 min ago
3 days 47 min ago
3 days 1 hour ago
3 days 10 hours ago